To Team or Not to Team
For the final Media Studies project, I came across the
decision to work individually. I initially was going to work in a group of two
with another person; however, after several activities and time passed, I
realized that this person I particularly wouldn’t work well with considering
this project is a full year. During the Lost at Sea activity in particular,
this person made too many decisions for themselves without considering what the
whole group was thinking. Despite having a higher score for the team portion,
the activity didn’t reflect the expertise of the programs for the project. The activity only reflected a situation I
would need to react to if I was stranded at sea. This style wouldn’t work sufficiently in a
group setting where collaboration is significant. I also don’t trust this
particular person to work at the same productivity as me towards our final project
that is graded by Cambridge. Additionally, the activity with the Social Media Peer
Account only confirmed my assumptions about the person. The person demonstrated
their personality traits clearly and solidified my decision to work individually for this
project.
I’ve
learned that trust, collaboration and accountability are amongst the most
important qualities needed to build a successful group of individuals. Team
building and Group dynamics mentions the significance of understanding
other’s personal backgrounds to make a better judgement of their actions in the
working environments based off specific individuals (Becker, 2015). I followed through
this methodology and it proved successful. I fully understood my partner’s
personal background while developing a sense of untrustworthiness and lack of potential
accountability. Accountability is essential for such a significant project that
determines whether you receive the AICE credit or not. Working with another person
that you don’t fully trust or can’t have full accountability over, isn’t a
viable option and would create a burden for myself. Trust is also a very important
factors that somewhat ties in with reliability. Trust is what builds
relationships and develops over time. If there is any question in trust, then
there is room for error during this project. I trust and understand myself better than anyone else, and I am choosing to work individually on this project because
of the former.
I believe that my personal traits can make my work more efficient, and I could become
more productive if I am working individually. I am not the most
social person, so I have learned to subconsciously think rather than
collaboratively discuss ideas. I organize things in my personal style and when I work
with others, I don’t like to enforce this upon them. Working individually allows me to creatively
express all of my organized thoughts in a style that doesn’t affect others. Songwriting
loafing or creative collaboration stated that some may think
that working in groups can compromise the individual songwriters’ visions, the
reality is that it is specific to the artists themselves and their creative
processes (Pettijohn, 2010). This demonstrates that, although collaboration can
be useful, sometimes working individually can be more efficient based on
the person's creative processes. When I was in a group setting, some of the
ideas or other processes that I would usually construct were domineered by some
of the leaders in the group. This was also mentioned in Songwriting loafing
or creative collaboration when they said that, “a leader of a group [can] becoming
controlling when it prohibits others from demonstrating all of their skills”
(Pettijohn, 2010). I personally connected with this statement and felt it reflected my experience somewhat accurately. This assisted in my decision to work individually
considering I didn’t want any of the ideas I had become prohibited from others.
For all of the previous reasons, I believe this decision will benefit me in many
ways that I had not previously realized.
Comments
Post a Comment